What Caused The 2008 Financial Crisis?

New York Stock Exchange | Photo by David Vives on Unsplash

In 2008, the world experienced one of the most significant financial crises in history. The stock market crash that occurred during this year had a long lasting impact on the global economy, leading to massive losses, layoffs, and bankruptcies. Many people were not prepared for such a stark outlook after the fact. Most people expected the impact to be much less severe.

The 2008 stock market and Real Estate market crash was caused by a confluence of factors, including the housing bubble, subprime mortgage crisis, and a highly leveraged financial sector. The housing bubble had been growing for years, fueled by easy credit, low interest rates, and speculation. This led to a rise in home prices, which many believed were unsustainable. When the housing market began to decline, homeowners were unable to pay their mortgages, leading to a surge in foreclosures and a subsequent decline in housing prices.

The subprime mortgage crisis was a major contributor to the 2008 stock market crash. Lenders had been granting loans to individuals who had little or no credit history and low incomes, known as subprime borrowers. These loans were packaged into complex financial instruments known as mortgage-backed securities, which were then sold to investors worldwide. When the subprime borrowers began to default on their mortgages, the value of these securities plummeted, leading to massive losses for investors.

The financial sector also played a significant role in the 2008 stock market crash. Many banks had become highly leveraged, meaning they had borrowed large sums of money to invest in the market. When the market began to decline, these banks were unable to meet their obligations, leading to a ripple effect throughout the financial sector.

 

Indonesian Stock Exchange | Photo by Ruben Sukatendel on Unsplash

 

The stock market crash began in earnest in September of that year. On September 15th, Lehman Brothers, one of the largest investment banks in the world, declared bankruptcy. This sent shockwaves throughout the financial industry, as many investors had believed that the government would bail out the troubled bank. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by more than 500 points that day, and the S&P 500 index declined by more than 4%.

The following days and weeks saw further declines in the stock market. On September 29th, the Dow Jones fell by more than 778 points, the largest single-day point loss in history. By the end of October, the Dow had lost more than 2,000 points since its peak in 2007.

The 2008 market crash and financial crisis had a profound impact on the global economy. Many businesses were forced to lay off employees, and many others declared bankruptcy. The housing market continued to decline, leading to even more foreclosures and a further decline in home prices. The financial sector was also heavily impacted, with many banks and investment firms either going bankrupt or being bailed out by the government.

In response to the 2008 Financial Crisis, governments worldwide implemented various measures to stabilize the economy. The US government passed the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), which provided funds to troubled banks and financial institutions. The Federal Reserve also lowered interest rates to near zero, in an effort to stimulate lending and investment.

 

New York Stock Exchange Photo by Oren Elbaz on Unsplash

The market crash was a reminder of the dangers of unchecked speculation and the importance of regulation. Many analysts pointed to the need for stricter oversight of the financial industry and the importance of transparency in financial transactions.

Another factor that contributed to the 2008 crash was the role of ratings agencies in the subprime mortgage bond market. These agencies, including Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch Ratings, were responsible for evaluating the creditworthiness of mortgage-backed securities and other financial instruments.

In the years leading up to the crash, the ratings agencies gave high ratings to many mortgage-backed securities, even those that were backed by subprime mortgages. This gave investors the impression that these securities were safe investments, even though they were based on risky loans.

The ratings agencies played a critical role in fueling the housing bubble by making it easier for lenders to issue subprime mortgages. When lenders knew that they could sell these mortgages to investors through mortgage-backed securities, they were more likely to issue them, even to borrowers who were unlikely to be able to pay them back.

The ratings agencies were also slow to react when the housing market began to decline. Even as the number of foreclosures increased and the value of mortgage-backed securities began to decline, the ratings agencies continued to give high ratings to these securities. This delayed the recognition of the true risks of these securities, leading to even more losses when the market finally collapsed.

 

Wells Fargo Closing Flagship Location | Photo by Jack Cohen on Unsplash

 

After the market crash was finally over, the ratings agencies faced significant criticism for their role in the subprime mortgage bond market. Many argued that they had failed in their duty to provide accurate and impartial assessments of the creditworthiness of financial instruments. Some even accused the ratings agencies of being complicit in the crisis, as they had a financial interest in giving high ratings to the securities they were evaluating.

In response to the criticism, the ratings agencies have made significant changes to their processes. They have increased their transparency, providing more information about the data and methods they use to evaluate securities. They have also improved their standards for evaluating the creditworthiness of financial instruments, including mortgage-backed securities.

However, many critics argue that the ratings agencies have not gone far enough to address the flaws in their processes. They argue that the agencies continue to face conflicts of interest, as they are paid by the issuers of the securities they are evaluating. This gives them a financial incentive to give high ratings, even when the securities are risky.

 

Photo by Melinda Gimpel on Unsplash

 

The role of ratings agencies in the subprime mortgage bond market was a significant factor in the 2008 Financial Crisis. The agencies gave high ratings to many securities that were based on risky loans, leading investors to believe that these securities were safe investments. When the housing market began to decline, the ratings agencies were slow to react, delaying the recognition of the true risks of these securities. Although the ratings agencies have made changes to their processes since the crisis, many critics argue that more needs to be done to address the flaws in the industry.

Is this reminiscent of the current climate in our banking industry today? Many would say so. Since 2008 plenty of people have advocated for stricter banking rules. Even more so than the new restrictions put in place after the crisis. Their reasoning was a simple prediction, if the banks are left unchecked like they have been, they will continue to do the same shady business dealings with little to no regard for the consequences. And it has been proven mostly true so far as SVB and Credit Suisse have both recently needed Huge bailouts, much larger than the 2008 banking crisis. Every situation is different however, so we have to wait and see how the many government agencies involved react, to prevent this from happening again.

Ultimately, the 2008 stock market crash along with the Real Estate crash, was a significant event in global history. It was caused by a combination of factors, including the housing bubble, subprime mortgage crisis, and highly leveraged financial sector. The crash had a profound impact on the global economy, leading to massive losses, layoffs, and bankruptcies. Governments worldwide implemented various measures to stabilize the economy, but the effects of the crash were felt for years to come.